MURF FALCON 2 LISTENING-LEVEL REVIEW Free planning worksheet | Checked October 16, 2026 Status: UNPERFORMED. Blank rows are not test results. This resource does not include free synthesis or calls. No native Burki Falcon 2 or volumeOffset control was verified. 1. DEFINE THE REPORT Business or synthetic case: _______________________________ Reported problem, in the listener's own terms: ______________ Actual listening channel and device: _______________________ Fixed playback setting: ___________________________________ Was the wording wrong, faint, incomplete, or uncomfortable? __ Evidence reference (authorized internal record, no credentials): __________________________________________________________ 2. FREEZE THE BASELINE Provider account/plan reference (not a key): ________________ Exact model and voice identifier: __________________________ Supported locale: _________________________________________ Endpoint region and application version: ___________________ Encoding / sample rate / receiver compatibility: ____________ Echo and interruption configuration revision: ______________ Other playback, mixer or gain settings: ____________________ Requested baseline offset: ______ Provider result: _________ Audio available? ______ Target-path observation available? __ Do not call an offset a dB or LUFS target. Keep provider-generated audio, application playback and listener feedback as separate observations. 3. ORIGINAL FICTIONAL SCRIPT Willow Hall: “Welcome to Willow Hall. For reception, please use the east entrance.” After the reply starts, the test caller asks: “Is that the entrance beside the café?” Expected: complete, comfortable instruction on the target path, plus a response grounded in approved venue facts. If the entrance detail is unknown, request staff help. No booking or access authorization is implied. 4. PLAN COMPARISON ROWS The following values are a proposed review plan, not measurements or production recommendations. Any real request needs separate funding/authorization and current provider-contract verification. Keep voice, text, route and device fixed. Offset | Request status | Listening evidence | Unexpected input/echo | Decision 0 | ______________ | __________________ | _____________________ | ________ 10 | ______________ | __________________ | _____________________ | ________ 15 | ______________ | __________________ | _____________________ | ________ If the playback setting or device changes, create another labeled comparison. No usable audio / inconclusive results: _____________________ Comfort or artifacts reported: _____________________________ Exact passage repeated correctly / not repeated / unknown: __ 5. ACCEPTANCE CASES A. Silent caller while assistant speaks. Expected: no new self-interruption observed. Observed evidence / result / correction: ____________________ B. Caller asks the café question during playback. Expected: old reply stops appropriately; correction/question is handled using approved facts. Observed evidence / result / correction: ____________________ C. Transition to the next audio source. Expected: no distracting level change in the specific reviewed path. Observed evidence / result / correction: ____________________ D. Changed output is uncomfortable or introduces an artifact. Expected: reject the change and preserve a known baseline. Observed evidence / result / correction: ____________________ E. Out-of-range request in an authorized contract check. Expected from current documentation: 80 is clamped to 50, not rejected. A successful response alone does not prove the exact requested offset was applied. Validate locally before sending. No request was run for this worksheet. Observed evidence / result / correction: ____________________ Clamp source: https://murf.ai/api/docs/text-to-speech-models/falcon-2 6. COST AND DECISION Current account rate / access date / currency: ______________ Assumed or measured billable characters (label which): ______ Other recognition, LLM, platform and carrier costs: __________ Discarded/repeated output accounted for? ___________________ Chosen change / rejected change / unresolved: _______________ Reviewer, evidence and next limited check: __________________ Rollback baseline reference: _______________________________ 7. CURRENT PRIMARY REFERENCES Dated change: https://murf.ai/api/docs/changelog/2026/10/13 Request fields: https://murf.ai/api/docs/api-reference/text-to-speech/stream Control and echo cautions: https://murf.ai/api/docs/text-to-speech/speech-customization Model and price: https://murf.ai/api/docs/text-to-speech-models/falcon-2 No provider latency or intelligibility claim was measured for this worksheet.